(September 25, 2010 at 4:32 pm)Ace Wrote:(September 25, 2010 at 3:20 pm)A Theist Wrote: Bill O'Reilly debates Richard Dawkins and wins. What do you think?
Dawkins won that argument, for his points still stand.
Just because we don't have all the answers doesn't mean you do with god.
No one knows how everything came about, even theists. Dawkins made excellant points and O'Reilly just ignored them. Plus, O'Reilly started yelling. Not a good thing when your trying to defend your argument.
Dawkins answered and with great points. O'Reilly lost the argument the moment he started yelling.
That's all I have to say. O'Reilly is a prat.
Quote:Dawkins won that argument, for his points still stand.Dawkins had no point to stand on when O'Reilly got him to admit that science doesn't have all the answers. No way was Dawkins the clear cut winner.
Just because we don't have all the answers doesn't mean you do with god.
What did you think of the "The Young Turks" assessment of the debate?
"Inside every Liberal there's a Totalitarian screaming to get out"
![[Image: freddy_03.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=s25.postimg.org%2Fuq1y7aapr%2Ffreddy_03.jpg)
Quote: JohnDG...
Quote: JohnDG...
Quote:It was an awful mistake to characterize based upon religion. I should not judge any theist that way, I must remember what I said in order to change.
