(September 25, 2010 at 6:20 pm)A Theist Wrote: Dawkins had no point to stand on when O'Reilly got him to admit that science doesn't have all the answers. No way was Dawkins the clear cut winner.
Dawkins repeatedly pointed out that of course science does not have all the answers but O'reilly just ignored him.
So no, O'reilly did not win.
I'll say this in little words so you can understand.....
Science does NOT have all the answers, that is WHY it is science.
Science is the tool we use to find the answers, if and when we do have all the answers it won't be science anymore.
And even if science did find all the answers, idiots like O'reilly would still say it was god.
![[Image: mybannerglitter06eee094.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i118.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fo112%2Fpussinboots_photos%2FBikes%2Fmybannerglitter06eee094.gif)
If you're not supposed to ride faster than your guardian angel can fly then mine had better get a bloody SR-71.