Ask an Anti-Feminist!

[Dystopia]

''Rational''-Wiki is a sham; the sources they cite for articles are not reliable but opinion pieces - it's not that ''Rational''-Wiki can't be reliable, it's just that it isn't. It's agenda driven; they've banned people for disagreeing --- it's a problem with wiki's, they cite sources which are more often than note, opinion pieces and unethically making assertions, which is terribly misleading once you cite it in a database. I'm fully aware there are ''sources at the bottom of the page'' --- but if you know that, then you should be skeptical of the sources they cite.

Moreover, any wiki which feels the need to put ''Rational'' in it's title, as if it is some arbiter of truth needs skepticism; it's attempting to assert some false credibility, so nothing I've really seen suggests the wiki is reliable, especially considering some of the articles are horribly biased.

Thunderf00t presents himself as a man with an opinion; ''Rational'' Wiki doesn't, it presents itself as a data, but is terribly misleading once you examine the sources they cite.

Because? Which sources are wrong? How many articles have you read? Are the sources really wrong or do you just label them as wrong because they don't corroborate your preconceived opinion about reality? Of course one should be skeptical, but for the most part I've read sources with opinions that also cite other studies and make compelling arguments - I'll admit that rationalwiki has a problem with ridiculing its opponents, but that's about it. Is there anything that isn't agenda driven? Is any position ideologically neutral by 100%? So what if they have banned people? If I formed a group with X goal I would happily ban people who directly oppose the group's core principles.
Anyone can be a man with an opinion, but many times opinions are biased and filled with prejudices. Tunderf00t rarely cites sources and just uses his definition on what he thinks feminism is and dismisses any women's issue as being imaginary. That's not a reasonable debate position, it's an ideologically biased one.