RE: Bill O'Reilly punks Richard Dawkins
September 26, 2010 at 9:40 am
(This post was last modified: September 26, 2010 at 9:45 am by A Theist.)
(September 26, 2010 at 8:46 am)Zen Badger Wrote:I'm trying to answer individual replies. I may sometimes repeat myself in the process.(September 26, 2010 at 8:38 am)A Theist Wrote: O'Reilly used them effectively to neutralize Dawkins arguments. When Dawkins admited that science couldn't answer how everything came into existence, he was put on the defense throughout the rest of the debate.You've already posted this and it has been rebutted. Stop repeating yourself.
Quote:Science doesn't know everything about evolution,...Quote:Judging by the comments in this thread, most agree with you that science doesn't know everything about evolution. Can anyone be certain that it even happened?This has been answered as well, or don't you read our replies?
Here are a couple of your replies to myself and "blood_pardon"...
My question:
Judging by the comments in this thread, most agree with you that science doesn't know everything about evolution. Can anyone be certain that it even happened?
Your answer:
Yes, because we're here.
Your response to "blood_pardon":
And the mass murderers and serial killers that say that god told them to do it, what do you think of their personal relationship with your god?
Just exactly, what did you rebutt?
"Inside every Liberal there's a Totalitarian screaming to get out"
![[Image: freddy_03.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=s25.postimg.org%2Fuq1y7aapr%2Ffreddy_03.jpg)
Quote: JohnDG...
![[Image: freddy_03.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=s25.postimg.org%2Fuq1y7aapr%2Ffreddy_03.jpg)
Quote: JohnDG...
Quote:It was an awful mistake to characterize based upon religion. I should not judge any theist that way, I must remember what I said in order to change.