No, that's a deflection. All I want to know is how you feel about one particular demographic being subject to an added layer of the same restrictions that you said you wouldn't tolerate if they were applied to you. I'm not the least bit interested in your religion's opinion of what its god allegedly thinks.
However, in order for the (rather nonsensical) statement that a person's "nature towards the same sex [is] unnatural" to be true, there would have to be no examples of same-sex interaction elsewhere in nature. Thus even a single such example would falsify the proposition. Guess what..?
However, in order for the (rather nonsensical) statement that a person's "nature towards the same sex [is] unnatural" to be true, there would have to be no examples of same-sex interaction elsewhere in nature. Thus even a single such example would falsify the proposition. Guess what..?
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'