RE: Evolution and natural selection ARE the gods of this world!
June 14, 2015 at 6:58 pm
(This post was last modified: June 14, 2015 at 7:00 pm by comet.)
First let me thank you for honestly challenging me and forcing me defend, rethink, and reword my "belief" in this topic past the normal shit kicking stupid atheist. Good show for you.
no one said it was "thinking" as in complex processing on the level of our brain. But when looking at the formation of the brain, it was formed in a more complex system that did data processing. That's just a simple fact of life as they say. weather it is knowingly doing it I don't know.
if we look at how evolution forms a life form. It is as logical it can be. The particle interactions in the system "caused and effected" a set of particle interactions that "problem solved" in order to reproduce in the most efficient manor with the resources available. And dna , rna, and protein production most certainly can be thought of a probability matrix or information processing "reasoning".
Also, Life was preplanned in that we were going to be here at the moment of the big bang. That's just simple. In effect, the brain uses cause and effect, so does evolution. So really now we have more of a 1.5 out of 2 definitions. It is not 1 to 1.
the we can use common sense with the definition of #2. Nobody claims it is "thinking" like you or me. So number doesn't even fit, but as we see, the universe as a data processer clearly can be linked to the standard model . It is in main stream physics, so I am not saying anything controversial here.
so as it stands, with a real lack in understanding for us all, but based on what we do know, "a reason", a "purposes", even if it is unclear to what depth they are, is more rational than "no-nothing" reason. In regards to "reasoning", the verb, or using cause and effect to logically work through a problem, evolution may not be a human brain, but it is certainly is a set algorithms more sophisticated than most computers.
no one said it was "thinking" as in complex processing on the level of our brain. But when looking at the formation of the brain, it was formed in a more complex system that did data processing. That's just a simple fact of life as they say. weather it is knowingly doing it I don't know.
if we look at how evolution forms a life form. It is as logical it can be. The particle interactions in the system "caused and effected" a set of particle interactions that "problem solved" in order to reproduce in the most efficient manor with the resources available. And dna , rna, and protein production most certainly can be thought of a probability matrix or information processing "reasoning".
Also, Life was preplanned in that we were going to be here at the moment of the big bang. That's just simple. In effect, the brain uses cause and effect, so does evolution. So really now we have more of a 1.5 out of 2 definitions. It is not 1 to 1.
the we can use common sense with the definition of #2. Nobody claims it is "thinking" like you or me. So number doesn't even fit, but as we see, the universe as a data processer clearly can be linked to the standard model . It is in main stream physics, so I am not saying anything controversial here.
so as it stands, with a real lack in understanding for us all, but based on what we do know, "a reason", a "purposes", even if it is unclear to what depth they are, is more rational than "no-nothing" reason. In regards to "reasoning", the verb, or using cause and effect to logically work through a problem, evolution may not be a human brain, but it is certainly is a set algorithms more sophisticated than most computers.
anti-logical Fallacies of Ambiguity
