Hello, Anyone interested in a debate?

[Mister Agenda]

Second.  My argument was not to deal with atheism.  As stated I wanted to talk about imaginary friends.  Though I must state I would find a mind body dualist atheist rather paradoxical.  As their lack of theistic belief logically stems from the lack of empirical or explicit evidence.  For them to willingly accept circumstantial or implicit evidence (which science for the most part does.  Think proof of a black hole) then I would be forced to defer to the statements of one Immanuel Kant, "There is no argument to prove the existence of god nor is there one to disprove the existence of god.  However, there is not more implied (circumstantial) existence than that of a god."

---

Maybe you should give up projecting what you think atheists must or should think and become open to learning what they actually do think. A lack of theistic belief can logically stem from many origins, including never having been indoctrinated to have one. You've uncovered a nest of skeptics here, which is exactly for what you say your are looking, but skeptics have a tendency to like words to be used precisely, especially in debates. If what atheists actually think is not a topic of interest for you, it will be easy for you to avoid derailing your own thread by focusing on the imaginary friend thing and not on what your imaginary atheists think.