Why Does Atheism Have to be False?

[crosssaves]

You have somehow managed to become even more arrogant and dismissive. I've no further interest in talking to you.

I don't care if there is a god, and I'm not claiming there isn't. And to expect all atheists to agree is to utterly misunderstand everything about the subject.

If you decide to become polite and respectful and interested in actually learning anything, then get back to me.

You're just sinning bearing false witness. Try to back up your accusations.

There you have it, you admit you don't care which is not interested, polite, respectful or empathetic. Since you admit God could exist then you are what is called agnostic. This is no better than Atheism, because both sides do not accept the uncreated Creator which was proven and you shut your mind down to that proof.

I don't expect all atheists to agree why they are atheists, as such confusion is typical in the world. Who is the author of confusion and the god of this world? But I do know all theists have the same reason why the uncreated Creator exists by this proof even someone on a remote island thousands of years ago would hold. 

I have been polite and respectful and interested, but you have not been any of these things. Why do you not treat others as you would like to be treated?

---

Read the opening post. That's why I posted it, not for you to ignore it. Don't shut your mind down.

The opening post is a disgusting pile of Kalam that has been digested and vomited several times.

Give me the facts, give me the evidence, then we can talk

You're mistaken and misread. Kalam says what begins to exist must have a cause. Whereas I have not assumed that which exists in nature began to exist, but proved it by the evidence. It would be incumbent upon you then to respond to the opening post that gives the proof. As the previous agnostic poster just said, he doesn't care anyway that's why you would not do so.