Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 18, 2025, 1:48 am

Thread Rating:
  • 7 Vote(s) - 1.57 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
Really, GC, deaths were higher because of two world wars, which were 70 years ago.  Since then, war casualties have gone down, life expectancy up, access to clean food/water/shelter way up, literacy and education up, etc.

Today, June 25th, 2015 is the best day this planet has ever seen.  And tomorrow will likely be even better.  And yes, that's accounting for ISIS, Syria, Ukraine, the shit bowl that is Africa, etc.

You're indoctrinated to see the world as teetering on the brink because Christianity is all about Christ coming back and saving the faithful.  Funny thing is, every generation of Christian has believed they were living in the End Times.  It hasn't happened yet, obviously, and never will.  And while you see doom pulling at the strings of every action the numbers, the facts, tell us this is the safest, most prosperous world we've ever lived in.

And I'll let you in on a secret: I don't care what the scriptures say.  At all.  They hold literally no value to me.  Toilet paper means more to me.  I know enough about your religion to see it for the farce it is.  I have no desire to pursue it further.  Until you can come up with something more compelling than the tired 'personal relationship' crap, I see no reason to take it seriously at all.  It's just a series of ridiculous ideas competing against other, similar ridiculous ideas.

Regarding Adam and Eve, it's clear that they had no idea of right and wrong since nothing wrong had ever happened until Eve ate the Fruit.  All they had to go on was god telling them not to eat it with no explanation as to why.  Adding the two together, it's pretty clear that they were childlike and easily swayed.  The metaphor of them being naked and carefree, then shameful upon receiving knowledge and disobeying is pretty clear in its transition.  But you strike me as someone who doesn't see the bible as a series of metaphors and parables.
"I was thirsty for everything, but blood wasn't my style" - Live, "Voodoo Lady"
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach - by KevinM1 - June 25, 2015 at 10:09 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Proving evolution? LinuxGal 24 3727 March 19, 2023 at 10:36 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
  What will win the god wars? Faith, Fantasy, Facts, or God? Greatest I am 98 9861 December 28, 2020 at 12:01 pm
Last Post: Greatest I am
  In what way is the Resurrection the best explanation? GrandizerII 159 22017 November 25, 2019 at 6:46 am
Last Post: Abaddon_ire
  Travis Walton versus The Resurrection. Jehanne 61 18218 November 29, 2017 at 8:21 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  Why do Christians believe in the Resurrection of Jesus but not alien abductions? Jehanne 72 13555 June 27, 2016 at 1:54 am
Last Post: Redbeard The Pink
  We can be certain of NO resurrection - A Response Randy Carson 136 42901 October 2, 2015 at 4:10 am
Last Post: Aractus
  Disproving The Resurrection By The Maximal Facts Approach BrianSoddingBoru4 160 30543 July 5, 2015 at 6:35 pm
Last Post: Jenny A
  Obama and the simulated resurrection professor 116 21296 April 25, 2015 at 10:39 pm
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) His_Majesty 1617 407737 January 12, 2015 at 5:58 pm
Last Post: dyresand
  The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Ad Neuseum) YahwehIsTheWay 32 8067 December 11, 2014 at 4:58 pm
Last Post: robvalue



Users browsing this thread: 8 Guest(s)