I asked you that before and you waved away it's relevancy: Do you know anything about church history besides what your church claims to be history? Do you know how a church, if you want to call it that - in Rome of all places - really looked like at that time? Do you know that the title "bishop of Rome" didn't even exist outside the minds of those, who came at a much later point in time? If for no other reasons than that there was no church as you understand it today. There were just people handing down oral traditions and legends, divided amongst themselves over what they actually should believe.
But I guess I could just as well speak to a wall, since you obviously have some difficulties to distinguish between fact and say so.
But I guess I could just as well speak to a wall, since you obviously have some difficulties to distinguish between fact and say so.