Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 27, 2025, 8:06 am

Thread Rating:
  • 7 Vote(s) - 1.57 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(June 27, 2015 at 9:40 pm)tonechaser77 Wrote: See that's just the point Randy. I've read across the lines. I've read Jesus supporters by believers, Jesus supporters by atheists, mythicists and the likes. I don't just read one area and run with it. As I've said at least 3 or 4 times in this thread, I land where the evidence leads and makes most sense.

Wouldn't it be more accurate to say that you land where YOUR PERSONAL INTERPRETATION leads and makes the most sense to your fallible understanding?

Quote:It's quite obvious that you have not done the same. The fact that you dismiss something without truly studying the subject thoroughly proves that you're just another person presupposing belief and backing into it by cherry picking your works.

You, my friend, are a fraud in the worst degree. It's a shame to watch you regurgitate information that has been disproven time and time again.

Rubbish. It is not necessary for me to spend hundreds of hours reading the list of crappy books that you have poured over just so I can say that I've read them.

There's a REASON why real scholars pay no attention to Richard Carrier, David Fitzgerald, and Acharya S.

There's a REASON why knowledgeable ATHEISTS pay no attention to Richard Carrier, David Fitzgerald, and Acharya S.

Have you spent time reading books denying the holocaust, also?
Do you deny that man ever landed on the moon?
Do you believe that Bush knew about 9/11 in advance or that all the Jews stayed home from work that day because they knew?

Waste your life on ridiculous conspiracy theories if you want. I don't need to read up on BOTH sides of the argument to know stupid people write stupid books. But I can see that you are eager to lap up all that these folks have to say. That's no surprise, really...

2 Timothy 4:3
3 For the time will come when people will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach - by Randy Carson - June 28, 2015 at 10:37 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Proving evolution? LinuxGal 24 4790 March 19, 2023 at 10:36 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
  What will win the god wars? Faith, Fantasy, Facts, or God? Greatest I am 98 13049 December 28, 2020 at 12:01 pm
Last Post: Greatest I am
  In what way is the Resurrection the best explanation? GrandizerII 159 26402 November 25, 2019 at 6:46 am
Last Post: Abaddon_ire
  Travis Walton versus The Resurrection. Jehanne 61 20029 November 29, 2017 at 8:21 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  Why do Christians believe in the Resurrection of Jesus but not alien abductions? Jehanne 72 15244 June 27, 2016 at 1:54 am
Last Post: Redbeard The Pink
  We can be certain of NO resurrection - A Response Randy Carson 136 46728 October 2, 2015 at 4:10 am
Last Post: Aractus
  Disproving The Resurrection By The Maximal Facts Approach BrianSoddingBoru4 160 34764 July 5, 2015 at 6:35 pm
Last Post: Jenny A
  Obama and the simulated resurrection professor 116 23386 April 25, 2015 at 10:39 pm
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) His_Majesty 1617 464358 January 12, 2015 at 5:58 pm
Last Post: dyresand
  The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Ad Neuseum) YahwehIsTheWay 32 8683 December 11, 2014 at 4:58 pm
Last Post: robvalue



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)