(October 7, 2010 at 12:59 am)pacian Wrote: [quote='Dotard' pid='97745' dateline='1286326794']
[quote='pacian' pid='97704' dateline='1286316728']
Okay, first, your first question? "A woman has a child with a father whom she did not choose. How does that decrease the survivability of the child? " A woman in general is programmed to be attracted to male’s that increases her child‘s survivability in the long run. Women choose the men who have the best traits to do this because their children are more likely to have the same traits and thus there kids are more likely to be more attractive to reproduce. If a man rapes a woman, the woman did not filter him to sleep with him. The man on his own, might have attractive qualities, but the fact that the woman didn’t choose him means he could also have bad qualities that would make their kids less likely to survive, maybe he’s ugly, maybe he has no social smarts, or no logical intelligence, maybe he has no charisma and can’t get laid from females. Those are traits their children could express and thus make the children less likely to survive, decreasing survivability.
I think you're putting too much faith in the behaviour of drunken whores on the dancefloor hahahah the consequence of you telling women this is that you may increase your chances or getting laid because you're creditting them with intelligence... but otherwise your conclusions are meritless.
Women do not filter out partners based on survival traits such as intelligence, strength or the ability to pick apples from a tree, they pick their partner based on physicial cuteness, money (which you could argue was security, and that'd be fairly accurate, but it borders on vanity also) and the idiocy of the man to let himself be controlled. And that is true for the most part.