RE: Meaning of Right and Wrong... Finally Answered!
October 7, 2010 at 8:08 am
(This post was last modified: October 7, 2010 at 8:15 am by Dotard.)
(October 7, 2010 at 12:59 am)pacian Wrote: but the fact that the woman didn’t choose him means he could also have bad qualities that would make their kids less likely to survive, maybe he’s ugly, maybe he has no social smarts, or no logical intelligence, maybe he has no charisma and can’t get laid from females. Those are traits their children could express and thus make the children less likely to survive, decreasing survivability.
What a load! Because the woman didn't chose him he may have bad traits.......decreasing survivability. Where did you pull that one out of? You insinuating women don't chose mates with bad traits? They don't choose mates straight out of prison, cronically unemployed or genetic defects? How on God's green earth would you know if there are any genetic defects or undesirable traits in an unchosen father?
I stopped reading right there. I could easily come up with some silly ancedotal example using a recently paroled, cronically unemployed chosen mate compared to a "slower running", cronically employed unchosen mate of small stature, in which the 'survivability' of the child is increased. The dude has the ways and means to provide shelter and financial support to the child and mother.
I'm sure both of us could come up with many ancedotes to support our contentions. Bottom line though, is;
Yes, many of our morals can be linked to survival of the species and propagation, but in no way is it absolute.
(October 7, 2010 at 1:11 am)Cerrone Wrote: I think you're putting too much faith in the behaviour of drunken whores on the dancefloor hahahah the consequence of you telling women this is that you may increase your chances or getting laid because you're creditting them with intelligence... but otherwise your conclusions are meritless.
Women do not filter out partners based on survival traits such as intelligence, strength or the ability to pick apples from a tree, they pick their partner based on physicial cuteness, money (which you could argue was security, and that'd be fairly accurate, but it borders on vanity also) and the idiocy of the man to let himself be controlled.
OMG! I have a kindred spirit! Who'dathought?
I'd like to cordially invite you to join NO MA'AM. See link at bottom of post.
I used to tell a lot of religious jokes. Not any more, I'm a registered sects offender.
---------------
...the least christian thing a person can do is to become a christian. ~Chuck
---------------
NO MA'AM
---------------
...the least christian thing a person can do is to become a christian. ~Chuck
---------------
NO MA'AM
![[Image: attemptingtogiveadamnc.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=img824.imageshack.us%2Fimg824%2F7042%2Fattemptingtogiveadamnc.gif)