Apparently saying that good science is repeatable/testable (and by extension the peer review system) isn't good enough for Hammy Hamza. I am really confused by this video. I would probably counter by saying what the Sahabah, and all of the Hadith, have said is testimony. We can't go back in time and check their accuracy so your entire religion is based on the say-so of others. History is always what people have said has happened. Obviously, they will have arguments against the Chinese Whispers narrative, because, they've heard it before from Christians, but the general idea is to show the hypocrisy of the Muhammadan position.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RXAjYt5LdXI
P.S. Any recommended reading material to more effectively refute this absurd narrative?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RXAjYt5LdXI
P.S. Any recommended reading material to more effectively refute this absurd narrative?