Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach

[Esquilax]

Given your intellect, I would recommend reading William Lane Craig's Reasonable Faith if you have not already done so. He gets a bad rap from folks in this forum, but I don't really think the negativity is deserved. The man is well-educated, highly intelligent and articulate. Even if you don't agree with him, you will undoubtedly enjoy being challenged by him.

So, I just wanna be real clear here: you bitch us all out on a routine basis (based on nothing, but that's a conversation you're avoiding in another thread) for having presuppositions against your position... and yet you'll recommend the work of a man who is on record, in writing and on film, numerous times, confirming his own presuppositions in this area, something that you would and have dismissed the words of others here for.

So, I mean... fuck, right? If you were being consistent to your own positions you'd have to dismiss everything WLC says out of hand, right? It's what you did to Cato on the basis of presuppositions you merely assert to exist, and here you have a set of presuppositions I can confirm to you in writing and video in a matter of minutes; why the hypocrisy?