RE: Classical Logic
October 8, 2010 at 4:06 pm
(This post was last modified: October 8, 2010 at 4:10 pm by Edwardo Piet.)
Atheism isn't supposed to account for rationality, atheism is nothing more than disbelief in God.
Theism certainly seems to do a pretty good job at accounting for a whole lot of extra irrationality though
Since universal truths are true already, and universally so, they are true regardless of if a super sky-wizard hocus-pocused them into existence or not.
They are tautologically true, intrinsically true. That is the whole point of tautology, they are true independent of anything else: So to say they depend on God makes no sense whatsoever.
Theism certainly seems to do a pretty good job at accounting for a whole lot of extra irrationality though

Matt Slick Wrote:Atheism has no way of accounting for these universal truth statements.
Since universal truths are true already, and universally so, they are true regardless of if a super sky-wizard hocus-pocused them into existence or not.
They are tautologically true, intrinsically true. That is the whole point of tautology, they are true independent of anything else: So to say they depend on God makes no sense whatsoever.