RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
July 6, 2015 at 2:48 am
(This post was last modified: July 6, 2015 at 2:48 am by Fidel_Castronaut.)
(July 5, 2015 at 9:38 pm)Randy Carson Wrote:(July 5, 2015 at 6:15 pm)Beccs Wrote: You know the strength of the argument when people start referring to WLC.
Who next, Ken Ham? Ray Comfort? Kent Hovind (with a screaming match because we refuse to refer to him as 'Dr')?
Ironically, I know the weakness of YOUR argument (and that of Esquilax) when you engage in ad hominem arguments against WLC rather than deal with his ideas instead.
You mean those arguments that have been proven and demonstrated time after time to fall under their own illogical premises? Those arguments?
*sigh*