(July 5, 2015 at 9:38 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: Ironically, I know the weakness of YOUR argument (and that of Esquilax) when you engage in ad hominem arguments against WLC rather than deal with his ideas instead.
But... you've seen me engage with WLC's ideas. You agreed with me that he was wrong the last time I did that. There's at least three other threads on this board where I've tackled Kalam, several more where I've hit up the Teleological argument, and even just in here I've addressed his arguments regarding the Holy Spirit. What more could I possibly do?
Quote: And yet, you continue to argue with me...
Are you not amenable to changing your mind when presented with sufficient evidence to do so?
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!