RE: Do you have the right to be an atheist?
July 6, 2015 at 11:10 am
(This post was last modified: July 6, 2015 at 11:13 am by Excited Penguin.)
(July 6, 2015 at 11:05 am)pool Wrote: I don't understand.
If i choose the 5 others then i have a higher probability of being a bridge to have more significant contributions done to society.
And i'm a member of society so its all beneficial to only me.
I don't have any illness,i can simply look at things in such a way that nobody else can.(Apparently)
You're deviating the discussion - they haven't admitted defeat
![[Image: f36e5f16db2aae0ff0e66bfcae78b0204130df3a...fba313.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=s2.quickmeme.com%2Fimg%2Ff3%2Ff36e5f16db2aae0ff0e66bfcae78b0204130df3a307c93cf4a448db42efba313.jpg)
Yeah, look, I totally agree on the whom to sacrifice part. But according to you, you can't make that choice - you said yourself that every life matters just as much, no matter what.
Here, let me show you:
A.
Society determines the value of a persons life by evaluating the positive qualities a person have and the negative qualities a person have.
More positive qualities and least negative qualities means more value to someone's life.
Anyway,my point is i think everyone's life is equally important when you look at it logically.
VS
B.
Also,its impossible to determine the future of an individual unless i know them very well so 1(or more) of the 5 persons may contribute something significant to society whereas i know my mother very well and i'm positive she won't contribute anything significant to society.
That's my reasoning.
See how A contradicts B?