(July 6, 2015 at 10:19 am)Esquilax Wrote:(July 5, 2015 at 9:38 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: Ironically, I know the weakness of YOUR argument (and that of Esquilax) when you engage in ad hominem arguments against WLC rather than deal with his ideas instead.
But... you've seen me engage with WLC's ideas. You agreed with me that he was wrong the last time I did that. There's at least three other threads on this board where I've tackled Kalam, several more where I've hit up the Teleological argument, and even just in here I've addressed his arguments regarding the Holy Spirit. What more could I possibly do?
Oh, gee, I dunnoo...continue to address the ideas without attacking the man, perhaps?
Quote:Quote: And yet, you continue to argue with me...
Are you not amenable to changing your mind when presented with sufficient evidence to do so?
Of course. Provided that I believe the source to be reliable. In your case, I know your animosity toward the Christian faith; consequently, I am skeptical of everything you say. So, I listen to your ideas...refute some...discount most...and agree occasionally. I would be thrilled to think that i'm getting that much in return.