(July 7, 2015 at 1:52 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: Actually, you do. You need to have an explanation that is better than the resurrection; otherwise, the resurrection IS the best explanation of the facts, and knowing this will haunt you because you do not want it to be true.
So, got something?
No, I actually don't.
I don't need a theory for the origins of the universe better than 'magic pink unicorn created it' to reject that theory as implausible.
Lol. As you almost found out, there are many things that haunt me, Randy, but resurrection is not one of them.
I don't know, Randy. I'm not even convinced Jesus existed and died, because I don't have enough information to make a judgement.
But what I do know is that there hasn't been one documented case of a human being coming back to life after being dead for three days.
And based on that information and the unconvincing nature of your evidence, I reject your theory of resurrection.
A ridiculous violation of basic laws of biology is not the best explanation. Ever heard of Occam's razor?
This is just another of your beloved god of the gaps argument. 'You don't have an explanation, therefore he must have risen from the dead'. Nope. Does not work that way.
