Classical Logic

[theVOID]

Thanks VOID I like the video - all these arguments for the existence of God are fallacious IMO and I'm in total agreement with AE. How people making these arguments can make those arguments beggars belief, because if they were right it would contradict the nature of God as revealed in the Christian bible. Fact is it has to be non proven and an option to be given assent rather than be known.

Too right fr0d0

Matt Slick and his cronies are pretty much destroying all the good work by Plantinga and Siwneburn etc, who know that while they cannot possibly necessitate God through logic, they can at least shoot down the objections (Such as Rowe's argument) and come off looking well thought out and highly respectable.

Matt Slick's other argument of favor is the modal form of the ontological argument for the existence of God that Plantinga developed, even though Plantinga abandoned it in the 70's.