(July 8, 2015 at 5:43 pm)pocaracas Wrote:(July 8, 2015 at 5:34 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: Jenny-
Mark was not written 70 years later. If that were the case, it would have been after the turn of the century.
No one accepts that date. You shouldn't either. Mark was written very early as I have shown in another thread.
Maybe one reason why you are having a hard time finally coming to a faith position is that you are working with bad data.
Garbage in, garbage out.
What difference does it make if it was written 70 or 40 years after the fact?
Not much for the purpose of the OP. However, Jenny seems to believe that the late dating of Mark gives her the out she needs to avoid accepting Mark as a reliable recorder of historical events.