RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
July 8, 2015 at 7:12 pm
(This post was last modified: July 8, 2015 at 7:14 pm by IATIA.)
(July 8, 2015 at 7:09 pm)Randy Carson Wrote:(July 8, 2015 at 7:08 pm)IATIA Wrote: These 'professionals' are just as biased as any theist. They have already decided what they believe before researching. pocaracas has a valid point, but today's theists just ignore the fact that their religion is just a plagiarism of of the older religions.
Would that be true of the atheist and agnostic scholars of the NT, also?
That would be true of anyone that believes the NT or OT is original work. Atheists and agnostics have their fair share of idiots, it is not a domain owned solely by theists.
You make people miserable and there's nothing they can do about it, just like god.
-- Homer Simpson
God has no place within these walls, just as facts have no place within organized religion.
-- Superintendent Chalmers
Science is like a blabbermouth who ruins a movie by telling you how it ends. There are some things we don't want to know. Important things.
-- Ned Flanders
Once something's been approved by the government, it's no longer immoral.
-- The Rev Lovejoy
-- Homer Simpson
God has no place within these walls, just as facts have no place within organized religion.
-- Superintendent Chalmers
Science is like a blabbermouth who ruins a movie by telling you how it ends. There are some things we don't want to know. Important things.
-- Ned Flanders
Once something's been approved by the government, it's no longer immoral.
-- The Rev Lovejoy
