Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach

[Longhorn]

There's nothing here to respond to.

I'm not making an argument from numbers as a means to "prove" Christianity. Muslims, Hindus and Buddhists have big numbers, too.

I'm simply pointing out that out of a sample size that large, it is unreasonable to believe that ALL Christians are the stupid idiots that atheists in this forum like to claim.

Uh. Hello, mr. Strawman, pleased to make your acquaintance. Who says that? did I say that? When? Was I drunk?

So, once you set aside the false sense of intellectual superiority, you have one less reason to believe that atheist are right and Christians are wrong.

Hello again, mr. Strawman! First off, when and where did I proclaim myself to be intellectually superior to all christians? Because I don't believe that to be the case, and certainly not the reason I'm not a christian. I'm not a christian because I evaluated the claims made by christianity and found no evidence to support them. I most certainly did not follow the line of reasoning you accuse me of.

"We're smart, and Christians aren't" is not valid reason for atheists to deny Christianity.

that's why it isn't! The reason for most atheists' lack of belief is lack of evidence, not the intelligence of the believers! Again, who says that?