RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
July 9, 2015 at 2:35 pm
(This post was last modified: July 9, 2015 at 2:38 pm by Pizza.)
(July 9, 2015 at 2:06 pm)Minimalist Wrote:I remember listening to a debate between and Arif Ahmed (atheist) and Gary Habermas. Habermas couldn't clearly reply to any of Ahmed's points, especially the point that if we rule in irregularities, and supernatural explanations we have no reason to prefer one supernatural explanation over another(at 13:20).Quote:Has Randy actually given a clear explanation of the "five facts?"
It's the Habermas shit. A bunch of theologians looked at the holy horseshit and decides that THEY agree that this shit happened so he calls it a fact without a single shred of non-biblical evidence to back it up.
It's just bullshit.
Originally I think there were more than 5.
https://youtu.be/Mg7rYJxHA4Y?t=18m20s
It is very important not to mistake hemlock for parsley, but to believe or not believe in God is not important at all. - Denis Diderot
We are the United States of Amnesia, we learn nothing because we remember nothing. - Gore Vidal
We are the United States of Amnesia, we learn nothing because we remember nothing. - Gore Vidal