RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
July 9, 2015 at 4:53 pm
(This post was last modified: July 9, 2015 at 5:01 pm by Spooky.)
(July 9, 2015 at 2:06 pm)Minimalist Wrote:Quote:Has Randy actually given a clear explanation of the "five facts?"
It's the Habermas shit. A bunch of theologians looked at the holy horseshit and decides that THEY agree that this shit happened so he calls it a fact without a single shred of non-biblical evidence to back it up.
It's just bullshit.
Originally I think there were more than 5.
My point exactly. Not facts.
EDIT: This is going to be my response for a lot of posts:
I reject your reality and substitute my own!


