Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach

[KevinM1]

Did you even read what I wrote?

You continue to conflate the claim for evidence of the claim.  The claim itself is incredibly weak, given it's hearsay.

Your 'facts' are mostly assertions.  Others have given you plenty of point-by-point refutation, so I don't feel the need to regurgitate what they have already said.  I'm not a Christian apologist [emphasis added]; I understand that simply repeating the same thing in different ways doesn't strengthen my position.

Neither are Tim O'Neill and Bart Ehrman.

Okay?  You do realize I was referring to you, Steve II, Drich, and every other apologist that has come on here and acted as though rearranging the deck chairs of their favorite argument somehow significantly altered it?

I get that you're trying to be cute, but it'd be nice if you actually addressed what I wrote if you think it deserves a rebuttal or ignored it otherwise.