To the original post, atheism can account for these simple facts, merely because they are, indeed, simple. You seem to imply that a god must be required for A to equal A, when in reality an object is itself merely because if an object was not itself, for example, if a chair was actually a table, then it wouldn't be a chair. It would still be itself; a table. There is no way, with or without gods to turn something into something that isn't itself, because then the new self is itself without pause.
Yes, these simple laws are logical, but they exist in logic without a god.
Yes, these simple laws are logical, but they exist in logic without a god.
