RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
July 11, 2015 at 1:46 pm
(This post was last modified: July 11, 2015 at 1:51 pm by Cato.)
(July 11, 2015 at 1:37 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: Does that include Bart Ehrman,?Last I checked Ehrman wasn't Christian, so no. Again you seem to be having a difficult time with facts and basic logic. You obviously missed the point. The 'scholars' in general as justification for your bullshit is meaningless. This is not claiming that all scholars are biased, but that the bias pervades the academy. How fucking obtuse can you be?
(July 11, 2015 at 1:37 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: You're actually on my ignore list,...
What the fuck do I care? I'm likely a member of that esteemed group of people precisely because I have no problem demonstrating how disingenuous you are and have no compunction about shoving your bullshit back where it came from. You dismiss without consideration any contribution that doesn't already agree with your foregone conclusions so my replies to you aren't for your consideration anyway.
Keep posting your crap and I'll keep making sure its exposed.
(July 11, 2015 at 1:37 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: but I was curious to see what you were ranting about this time. Nothing of value, I see.That's right, no need to tarnish your perfect record of willful ignorance. Those quotes are from biblical scholars. You know, the same group you keep using to justify your ignorant secretions. You're talking out of both sides of your mouth. From one we constantly hear scholars, scholars, scholars. From the other we now have they add 'nothing of value'. Dolt.