RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
July 11, 2015 at 5:42 pm
(This post was last modified: July 11, 2015 at 5:47 pm by Pizza.)
(July 11, 2015 at 5:28 pm)Neimenovic Wrote:Seriously, if he wants us to put science on the ignore list and consider unscientific views why not Jesus was an alien, a wizard-false prophet, or any other unscientific conjure we can cook up? He gives us nothing. He's setting up the false dilemma of, "naturalism or the Christian view."(July 11, 2015 at 5:23 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: The fact is that proving the existence of Jesus the man says nothing at all about the deity. This entire argument is based on a non sequitur.
NOTHING Randy is trying to prove here does anything for his deity. Fuck, Jesus could've existed, performed miracles AND risen from the dead for all I care, and that still wouldn't prove any fucker named Yahweh to exist.
It is very important not to mistake hemlock for parsley, but to believe or not believe in God is not important at all. - Denis Diderot
We are the United States of Amnesia, we learn nothing because we remember nothing. - Gore Vidal
We are the United States of Amnesia, we learn nothing because we remember nothing. - Gore Vidal