RE: Classical Logic
October 13, 2010 at 12:50 am
(This post was last modified: October 13, 2010 at 12:57 am by Statler Waldorf.)
(October 8, 2010 at 7:51 am)IceSage Wrote:(October 8, 2010 at 2:37 am)blood_pardon Wrote: Atheism is deficient in accounting for rationality and should be dismissed as a worldview.
Despite all the other stuff I could totally demolish in your non-sense post that you are literally copying from other websites you probably recently read...
...Atheism is not a "worldview."
It's a response to the theist claim that there is a god, etc.
One atheist person could believe the world is composed of puppies and lollipops, and the other could be some hardcore scientist constantly in a lab all day.
PS. I'll probably be avoiding this thread from now on, because I've been through the whole mindfuck of this argument several times before, and have watched several Atheist Experience episodes, especially the one posted above, that make me palmface several times, so much, that I constantly need trips to the emergency room due to head trauma.
Talk a good game, play a bad one. Very cowardly too, post and run.
(October 13, 2010 at 12:48 am)Minimalist Wrote:Quote:I couldn't help but notice you did not address the issue.
Excuse me, young fellow, but am I supposed to address every crackpot theory that some xtian shithead throws out simply because he posts it? We have every right to question the motivations ( and integrity) of the con artists who sell religion to gullible fools.
Anything else?
I am new to this site, not new to the topic. Well if you want to run from the issue and just go the Ad Hominem route, be my guest. Those of us who understand logic recognize you for what you really are though. Someone who is insecure in their beliefs, suppresses the Truth and is on shaky (at best) logical ground.
(October 11, 2010 at 7:08 pm)R-e-n-n-a-t Wrote: To the original post, atheism can account for these simple facts, merely because they are, indeed, simple. You seem to imply that a god must be required for A to equal A, when in reality an object is itself merely because if an object was not itself, for example, if a chair was actually a table, then it wouldn't be a chair. It would still be itself; a table. There is no way, with or without gods to turn something into something that isn't itself, because then the new self is itself without pause.
Yes, these simple laws are logical, but they exist in logic without a god.
That argument made no sense. "The laws of logic could not be created by God because they are the laws of logic." Huh? You did not address the issue, where di the laws of Logic come from?
