Okay, how about this for a refutation of the 'argument': if logical absolutes exist only in God's mind, then they are not absolute, they are contingent. If God's mind were different, A could equal not A, which is nonsense. So the argument actually raises the possibility that, for instance, a chair might not be a chair. Great work there. Furthermore, a simpler explanation of logical absolutes is that they are a conceptual description of physical objects; they describe the nature of all physical things.
Howzat?
Howzat?
'We must respect the other fellow's religion, but only in the sense and to the extent that we respect his theory that his wife is beautiful and his children smart.' H.L. Mencken
'False religion' is the ultimate tautology.
'It is just like man's vanity and impertinence to call an animal dumb because it is dumb to his dull perceptions.' Mark Twain
'I care not much for a man's religion whose dog and cat are not the better for it.' Abraham Lincoln
'False religion' is the ultimate tautology.
'It is just like man's vanity and impertinence to call an animal dumb because it is dumb to his dull perceptions.' Mark Twain
'I care not much for a man's religion whose dog and cat are not the better for it.' Abraham Lincoln
