RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
July 13, 2015 at 8:48 pm
(This post was last modified: July 13, 2015 at 8:49 pm by Longhorn.)
(July 13, 2015 at 8:43 pm)Randy Carson Wrote:(July 13, 2015 at 8:00 pm)Neimenovic Wrote: It doesn't matter even if some are convinced, though I doubt there are many.
What I'm pointing out is not that your arguments are not convincing, but that they have a fundamental flaw: they were all formed with the presupposition that god exists and that the conclusion they reach is true. They are made through working your way back from the conclusion, which was never reached by critical thinking. To the contrary, if critical thinking is applied the conclusion cannot be reached.
These arguments were all invented much, much after faith came to exist. They are not the main reason people believe. They're the excuse made for believing. The presupposition they were formed with makes them invalid.
Do you have any counter-arguments to show that the evidence I have presented - the evidence accepted as true by the vast majority of scholars teaching at major universities throughout the Western world - is false?
Ignoring things won't make them go away Randy. Repeating myself is really tiresome, even if you never get enough of it.
