Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach

[Minimalist]

Here is another well-reasoned rebuttal to Randy's bullshit.  For anyone who wants to use it.  

http://debunkingchristianity.blogspot.co...ch-of.html

Habermas and Licona ignore the fact that a miraculous resurrection is always going to be more improbable than any improbable speculation about what may have happened instead. Improbable things happen all the time. People get struck by lightning. People win contests against overwhelming odds. So non-miraculous explanations of the resurrection might all be improbable, and yet better explain the evidence, since a miracle can still be far less likely to be true than those other improbable explanations. Unless they can show that our “improbable” explanations are more improbable than a miracle (and they never do), their argument can’t even get off the ground.

Unless you are a religious shithead who believes in "miracles."  Then...anything is possible if you want it to be.