RE: Can you be angry at "god" and simultaneously disbelieve its existence?
July 15, 2015 at 1:06 pm
(This post was last modified: July 15, 2015 at 1:08 pm by Catholic_Lady.)
(July 15, 2015 at 12:51 pm)Rhythm Wrote:(July 15, 2015 at 12:46 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Lol, come on Abaris. Be reasonable. Bush isn't any sort of religious leader, and his motives for going into war (flawed as they were) were not religious!Yes, he was. That's what candidates spend so much time pandering to religion to demonstrate. His motives? He said god told him to, spoke to him about it, he'd prayed on it, you see. Heaven forbid that he be talking out of his ass in the usual christer way, eh? Religious organizations and religious people -very often- use the blanket of their faiths in order to cover for doing things that have little to do with their religion, though..that I'll grant you. This is part of the utility of religion and religious organizations which has helped them to last so long.
You can't claim what Bush did as "Christian terrorism" or anything even remotely having to do with Christianity or religion.
Again I have to ask, if you're so quick to excuse one group...whats with the fetish against the other?
Pandering to religion?
The POPE, leader of the largest Christian denomination on earth, told him he should not start a war! Lol.
I thought I had heard all the conspiracy theories surrounding Bush. I had never heard the one about the war being done for religious reasons....

Lol, seriously guys, this is just getting silly. Looks like a lot of reaching going on.
EDITED TO ADD.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
-walsh