RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
July 16, 2015 at 9:54 am
(This post was last modified: July 16, 2015 at 9:56 am by robvalue.)
No, I don't assume science will eventually explain everything. I'd very much think that would not be the case in fact.
As for fine tuning, there's no evidence the universe could have been any other way to the way it is; no reason to think universal constants could have been any different. If they were different things would have been different. If life was to develop, it would develop under those conditions instead. Or maybe it wouldn't. The universe didn't grow for us to live in, we grew in the universe because the conditions happened to be right in a particular place.
I don't know what you mean about the long word, I assume you're talking about our genome or something? If you're trying to discredit evolution, then it is not a random process you are talking about.
As for fine tuning, there's no evidence the universe could have been any other way to the way it is; no reason to think universal constants could have been any different. If they were different things would have been different. If life was to develop, it would develop under those conditions instead. Or maybe it wouldn't. The universe didn't grow for us to live in, we grew in the universe because the conditions happened to be right in a particular place.
I don't know what you mean about the long word, I assume you're talking about our genome or something? If you're trying to discredit evolution, then it is not a random process you are talking about.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum