RE: "The Lord has redeemed all of us, all of us..." should we be grateful?
July 20, 2015 at 3:21 pm
(This post was last modified: July 20, 2015 at 3:21 pm by Catholic_Lady.)
(July 20, 2015 at 3:18 pm)Neimenovic Wrote:(July 20, 2015 at 3:12 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: I would never say that to you, or anybody.
Can you post a where I said this to you, as not an opinion? I don't remember ever doing so, and don't believe I would.
uh huh, like hell you wouldn't.
(July 16, 2015 at 5:46 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: He is speaking for himself.
If it's evidence to him, and he's not shoving anything down anyone's throats, then why the need for hostility? Be kind to the newb, it's not easy coming in here as a theist.
And it was shortly followed by this.....
(July 16, 2015 at 5:56 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote:(July 16, 2015 at 5:53 pm)Neimenovic Wrote: What hostility? Where? Shoving down throats?
He says beliefs need to be based in reality, so there is no place for 'it's evidence to me' here, that's subjective. He claims he has evidence. We've expressed that we're interested in seeing it. I'm just saying if I hear another Kalam I'm gonna part with my lunch, cos that's been done to death so much I think it's necrophilia at this point
Just saying you could have a softer, kinder tone, that's all. Just MHO from one friend to another. Do what you will.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
-walsh