(June 10, 2013 at 8:11 am)Drich Wrote: It's funny, I actually took the time to look up and cross reference a source that outlines all of the additions and omissions, and none of the nay sayers have even pointed to the first ACTUAL descrepency. All any of you can do is stand on the sidelines and point to the idea that there is a difference (how ever small) between a 1700 year old copy of the bible and a modern bible itself. How about this if you dont want to talk book chapter and verse. Show me another 1700 year old book that is still in print that has as few or fewer changes than the bible does. Maybe we can start there. If your not able to find anything and your not willing to discuss the actual changes made then know your arguements are empty and meaningless. Akin to the trash talk a 12 year old gives after he has had his but kicked, by the fat kid.
That's neither here nor there Drich.....your bible is still one book short.....it's called the book of Mormon....and the sooner you realize that your path to salvation flows through the prophet Joseph Smith the better off you'll be....unless you believe people of questionable character somehow piggy backed a religion onto another religion and that it's all bullshit........tell you, what I'll get you Mitt Romney's number......maybe he can help you see the light.
The trouble with the world is not that people know too little, but that they know so many things that ain't so.
-- Mark Twain
.