(January 22, 2018 at 9:47 am)MysticKnight Wrote:(January 22, 2018 at 9:40 am)Aoi Magi Wrote: You mean:-Taffy for sure doesn't have on possible definition and reality.
1. Taffy in all possible worlds has one definition and reality.
Ok... what does that have to do with the molestation-of-logic in 2 or 3?
For example, it can be created differently through different means. It can be added a mint taste. It has various ways it can taste or be made.
Is the same true of morality? Is a matter that it can be this or that, and can be made from anything like even Aliens?
Think about it. Really. What the heart of goodness is, and you will see love has to value things objectively as best as possible, and even relationships established by love have a truth with it.
Everything is created in truth, it's not chaotic chemicals that came out through mutations and other factors, that produces the value "it's good to love" nor is chemicals that make you inherit your actions nor are you actions at the end just physical but have spiritual intentions and they are linked to you.
Taffy does have only one possible definition and reality, because any other variation like "created differently through different means" would be a corruption.
And no, love doesn't have to value things objectively. Your neighbor doesn't love your parents as much as you do. Love is subjective.
"It's good to love" is not necessarily good... "it's good to love blood and gore", "it's good to love money", e.t.c
Quote:To know yet to think that one does not know is best; Not to know yet to think that one knows will lead to difficulty.
- Lau Tzu
Join me on atheistforums Slack (pester tibs via pm if you need invite)