Bombing Syria is stupid, this is just gonna be like Iraq war
April 12, 2018 at 6:58 am
(This post was last modified: April 12, 2018 at 7:02 am by Ruckus123.)
As bad one may think Assad is, gassing his own people or whatever. This is a war they need to fight on their own. If USA or Western allies gets involved, guess who gets the blame? Its essentially a civil war and then imperialists comes in, do we want this? Like i can understand fighting ISIS they are a threat world wide, but whatever Syria as a country does is something they themself need to figure out
Like Iraq War was a good idea in theory but i disagree with it in general. Essentially the idea that a country who is undemocratic. Why it is dangerous for a undemocratic to have nukes? Because its ruled by dictator etc you cannot trust them most of the time so the less of those who have nukes the better, and democratic nations usually promise not to use nukes is the reason. But essentially Iraq War was hated due to bad intel but i am against attacking countries with nukes except if they attack us, kinda like WW2 method, Japan attacked so then i understand with the attacking back method, however making it hard for those countries on getting nukes is recommended which is why i agree with Trump on backing out of the Iran deal, the less of this we have the better (not that i hate Iran) but nukes are really just a dangerous game. Same with nations with nukes, but being the aggressor in this, why?
Like i get supporting democratic forces who want that change but what good does it do to impose our way on them? It just is gonna be a mess again. Just let Syrians do this and figure out their own path this is something US should back away from entirely.
Like Iraq War was a good idea in theory but i disagree with it in general. Essentially the idea that a country who is undemocratic. Why it is dangerous for a undemocratic to have nukes? Because its ruled by dictator etc you cannot trust them most of the time so the less of those who have nukes the better, and democratic nations usually promise not to use nukes is the reason. But essentially Iraq War was hated due to bad intel but i am against attacking countries with nukes except if they attack us, kinda like WW2 method, Japan attacked so then i understand with the attacking back method, however making it hard for those countries on getting nukes is recommended which is why i agree with Trump on backing out of the Iran deal, the less of this we have the better (not that i hate Iran) but nukes are really just a dangerous game. Same with nations with nukes, but being the aggressor in this, why?
Like i get supporting democratic forces who want that change but what good does it do to impose our way on them? It just is gonna be a mess again. Just let Syrians do this and figure out their own path this is something US should back away from entirely.
