Josephus and other contemporaries on Jesus

[Amarok]

Another weak blurt. I answered Carrier's attack in detail. At length. With a careful deconstruction of his argument that showed he was dead wrong. And Carrier - who is usually on a hair-trigger to respond to the slightest criticism - has been asked how he would respond and yet has ... declined to do so. So perhaps you could actually detail how my reply to him is "inadequate". Simply blurting that it is is not an argument, I'm afraid. 

No you didn't you went long drivel filled rant kind of like your doing now .And he didn't respond because there is nothing to respond too sorry it bruises you ego that Senpai  Carrier won't notice you.

Oh yeah, well your [sic] a poopyhead, so there!" may be 'engagement' in you are four years old, but I was asking if anyone here is capable of detailed discussion based on the source material. Yet again we see you and the other boneheaded jerk here prancing around and squealing and yet doing everything you can to avoid actually tangling with the topics at hand. If I am so "inadequate", "feckless", "bullshit" and "weak" surely my arguments could be dispatched very easily. So what seems to be the problem?

Long you just love to watch yourself type don't you Timmy? and as i said the only thing anyone needs to do to refute your articles is read them .And yes your writing dispatches them quick to anyone who can read .

Gosh. Okay, please cite some of the historians who use Bayes the way Carrier does. See if you can actually back up your weak farting noises with some substance for once.

Lol i given you all the substance a hack like you deserves hell almost more the Dr Carrier gave you which is more then enough .