RE: What God's justification for eternal torment?
December 18, 2020 at 3:31 pm
(This post was last modified: December 18, 2020 at 3:31 pm by R00tKiT.)
(December 17, 2020 at 11:20 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: So tedious. OFC I can, but it seems a bit pointless to argue as much with a person who thinks that we can't rule demons out as the cause of earthqaukes. Obviously, if we handled the subject of knowledge in anything even approaching a similar way..you wouldn't wonder how a routine dismissal like that happens.
You didn't get it, did you ? The idea of a supernatural agent accounting for natural evil is not mine, by the way, it's plantinga's famous solution to the logical problem of evil. So, as you see, your "routine dismissals" ignored a full argument of a professional philosopher, which you think isn't worth discussing. Stop ignoring arguments and don't let your ego get in the way next time
Pathetic.
(December 17, 2020 at 11:20 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: If you think that moral realism is wrong, that's fine. You don't have any kind of moral authority, let alone an absolute moral authority, nor does your god, if moral realism is false. Here again, I;d suggest that you have a you problem. I'm doing fine.
Where did I ever claim I have moral authority, Wth are you talking about.?
(December 17, 2020 at 11:20 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: Meanwhile, in actual moral realism, a moral statement (good or bad) is considered to be true insomuch as the statement purports to report facts, and gets those facts right. False if it purports to report facts, and does not, or gets those facts wrong.
And if a god actually exists, he has more access to facts than you do, and obviously gets them right. God's moral statements must be more accurate than ours, then, isn't it?
