Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: May 16, 2024, 5:54 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Science without Religion is lame
#18
RE: Science without Religion is lame
(June 6, 2011 at 6:49 am)Gawdzilla Wrote:
(June 5, 2011 at 10:31 pm)Castle Wrote: Do you find Science technology is indistinguishable from magic?

Silly. "Any sufficiently advanced technology would be indistinguishable from magic."

Note: Technology. The item under review is an actual technology, it's not actually magic.

Note: "indistinguishable" does not mean it IS magic, just that the observer doesn't understand how it works. Ignorance is the key here. I'm very ignorant of string theory (namu amida butsu for that) and some alien technology millions of years ahead of us would be a PFM as well. Such mysteries do not mean magic has suddenly become a possibility, however, they just mean we don't know how they work. C.f. that cell phone in your pocket. Save a movie on it. Take that phone back to Benjamin Franklin, certified genius. Play it for him. He'll be amazed and freaked, but he won't have a clue how it works. But it doesn't work by MAGIC.

Sheesh.

Yes, Einstein did quote that the most incomprehensible thing about Universe is the Universe is comprehensible.
Since the world and universe is about 99% unknown to each and every one of us. Could magic be something that is highly unknown and when it appears it is manifested into our ego self (which is the known)? Perhaps the unknowns, could also be called spiritual,

The ancient spiritual Religions are now known, so it is no longer a magical or first time spiritual or magical experience. It hard for me to believe if God did have a plan, he would set it into the hands of the Christians in which have the worst record ever, for sin. Or some other one and only right way to God Religion.

For I’m spiritual rather than religious



Reply



Messages In This Thread
Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 5, 2011 at 10:31 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Violet - June 5, 2011 at 11:24 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 6, 2011 at 1:03 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Violet - June 6, 2011 at 1:06 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by jordi - June 6, 2011 at 2:07 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Violet - June 6, 2011 at 2:10 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by jordi - June 6, 2011 at 2:28 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by eric209 - June 6, 2011 at 2:48 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Violet - June 6, 2011 at 3:16 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 6, 2011 at 11:36 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by orogenicman - June 6, 2011 at 4:21 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Darth - June 6, 2011 at 4:26 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Violet - June 6, 2011 at 5:01 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Gawdzilla - June 6, 2011 at 6:49 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 6, 2011 at 12:10 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by eric209 - June 6, 2011 at 11:45 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by DeistPaladin - June 6, 2011 at 11:57 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Gawdzilla - June 6, 2011 at 12:17 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 6, 2011 at 12:24 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by eric209 - June 6, 2011 at 11:59 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by LastPoet - June 6, 2011 at 1:26 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Violet - June 6, 2011 at 2:04 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Violet - June 6, 2011 at 2:19 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 6, 2011 at 2:29 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Gawdzilla - June 6, 2011 at 4:28 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by eric209 - June 6, 2011 at 2:12 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 6, 2011 at 2:42 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 6, 2011 at 4:47 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by eric209 - June 6, 2011 at 4:53 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 6, 2011 at 5:38 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Welsh cake - June 6, 2011 at 3:29 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 6, 2011 at 4:26 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 6, 2011 at 5:07 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by eric209 - June 6, 2011 at 5:54 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 7, 2011 at 11:09 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by eric209 - June 7, 2011 at 2:22 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Anomalocaris - June 7, 2011 at 3:42 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Anomalocaris - June 6, 2011 at 8:17 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Violet - June 7, 2011 at 2:06 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 7, 2011 at 3:30 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 7, 2011 at 4:09 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by eric209 - June 8, 2011 at 1:02 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Violet - June 7, 2011 at 4:42 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Epimethean - June 8, 2011 at 12:47 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 8, 2011 at 3:32 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by eric209 - June 9, 2011 at 1:14 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 7, 2011 at 11:04 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Violet - June 8, 2011 at 12:22 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 8, 2011 at 1:14 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Epimethean - June 8, 2011 at 1:38 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Violet - June 8, 2011 at 5:19 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Darth - June 8, 2011 at 5:58 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Jax - June 8, 2011 at 6:59 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 9, 2011 at 4:24 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Epimethean - June 8, 2011 at 8:53 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by tackattack - June 9, 2011 at 1:03 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by tackattack - June 9, 2011 at 5:17 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 9, 2011 at 6:09 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by tackattack - June 9, 2011 at 6:50 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Epimethean - June 9, 2011 at 10:37 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 9, 2011 at 2:09 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Without citing the bible, what marks the bible as the one book with God's message? Whateverist 143 44443 March 31, 2022 at 7:05 am
Last Post: Gwaithmir
  Without the Shedding of Blood There is No Remission of Sin Rhondazvous 231 58904 June 4, 2017 at 9:31 am
Last Post: Zenith
  Little children who died without Baptism go to eternal Hell?! Jehanne 34 6187 February 29, 2016 at 6:22 pm
Last Post: Whateverist
  Why i choose science reason and atheism over religion dyresand 28 7390 December 29, 2015 at 5:43 pm
Last Post: dyresand
Exclamation Without God You will Fail! Gods Squad 110 17071 October 19, 2015 at 9:28 am
Last Post: Crossless2.0
  How to prove Christianity is right without trying very hard Dystopia 6 3745 July 15, 2015 at 5:01 am
Last Post: Excited Penguin
  How to Prove Your Own Position without Trying Very Hard Randy Carson 59 11846 July 14, 2015 at 10:27 pm
Last Post: Ravenshire
  Bad/Good Things That Happen Without the Aid of a Deity Nope 30 9804 June 11, 2015 at 6:41 pm
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  Is it possible to be "born again" without faith? naturestubbs1 11 3888 July 9, 2014 at 6:27 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  See if you can watch 30 seconds of this Video without facepalming OhWord 18 4966 May 31, 2014 at 11:53 am
Last Post: BlackSwordsman



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)