RE: Mitt Romney Gargles Nutsacks
January 14, 2012 at 10:24 pm
(This post was last modified: January 14, 2012 at 10:25 pm by Napoléon.)
(January 14, 2012 at 10:17 pm)Perhaps Wrote: It would be considered acting upon emotion, which in this case was not a rational thing to do as it will not provide a positive outcome - unless you get pleasure by demeaning others.
Wait what? It was basically another way of saying "you are wrong". Sure it had more 'emotion' to it, if you want to call it that. It was in no way irrational to say you were wrong however. How is providing a 'positive outcome' in this instance relevant to your original point?