RE: Possible Motive Emerges In The Connecticut Shooting
December 19, 2012 at 9:37 pm
(This post was last modified: December 19, 2012 at 9:38 pm by Shell B.)
(December 19, 2012 at 9:05 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Because he is fucking nuts.
How do you know that? Because his mother, who obviously blogs for personal attention, as all the comments on her personal blog are from people she knows, until she got this unwarranted attention said so?
Quote:You know, I have to laugh. Whenever something happens someone always says "where are the parents?"
No. In this case, I know exactly where his mom is -- on the internet griping about his dad and calling her son a mass murderer, despite the fact that he has never actually assaulted anyone. He is thirteen fucking years old.
Quote:Well here is a parent sounding the alarm and everyone wants to jump down her throat for being a lousy mother.
Oh, I didn't realize that telling the entire fucking world that her kid is sick is sounding the alarm. Maybe she should talk to people who can help (not dragging him to the fucking mental institution for *saying* he was going to jump out of the car instead of pulling over and talking to him) or even try telling him that she can help him instead of griping about how he doesn't keep his promise to get better. Stupid cunt.
Quote:Make up your fucking minds people.
I did.
Quote:At that time there were only single shot muzzle loading weapons. The most dangerous weapon we had was a 12-lb artillery piece. Please don't try to tell me that the FF mystically envisioned the Industrial Revolution and tanks, planes and M-16s.
So, because they didn't envision it, they were strictly excluding it? I'm just trying to understand why some people say they meant all firearms and some say they only meant muskets when they said neither explicitly. I would love to see one quote, but no one ever has one.
