RE: Will Jesus return on a white horse?
January 17, 2013 at 12:19 am
(This post was last modified: January 17, 2013 at 12:22 am by catfish.)
(January 17, 2013 at 12:12 am)Brian37 Wrote: Nice try.
He meant that believers often do horrible things and call them moral. But you knew that didn't you?
That is taking things out of context. He was not saying hideous acts are moral. Dumb ass.
LOL @ the dumbass claiming "out of context"!!!
See if you can spot the pattern here.
A theist claims an atheist takes things "out of context" when they don't agree with the other's interpretation...
An Atheist claims an a theist takes things "out of context" when they don't agree with the other's interpretation...
Fucking hypocrites...
.
(January 17, 2013 at 12:05 am)Rhythm Wrote: That someone might have a solid grasp of the concept (and a flair for communicating it). Some acts are void of morality - say, taking a piss. Others are invested with moral value, rightly or wrongly, positive or negative, and these we call "moral acts". Acts with moral or immoral consequence.
You fucking said it, immoral or moral...
Care to explain how something you would consider "wrong" or "negative" could be considered "moral"???
.
.
