RE: A thank you...
February 6, 2013 at 12:49 pm
(This post was last modified: February 6, 2013 at 12:51 pm by catfish.)
When one adds to the definition an example, and then denies being one because they don't fit that example, I see it as attempted redifining. (your interpretation may vary)
"For example, a user sets up a second ID and pretends it's an independent person supporting him, or is banned and sets up a second ID to try to get around the ban. I haven't been banned, so if you call me a sock puppet, you're saying that I'm posting under another username as well. "
.
"For example, a user sets up a second ID and pretends it's an independent person supporting him, or is banned and sets up a second ID to try to get around the ban. I haven't been banned, so if you call me a sock puppet, you're saying that I'm posting under another username as well. "
.
(February 6, 2013 at 12:46 pm)John V Wrote:(February 6, 2013 at 12:28 pm)catfish Wrote: I'm not saying that you are one, but I sure as Hades believe with 99.9% certainty that you are one...That's interesting. Who do you see as my alter-ego?
Quote:(btw, did you just try redefining sockpuppet?)I provided a correct definition after you gave an incorrect one. If you think of that as "redefining," well, whatever.