(September 12, 2013 at 9:06 pm)BadWriterSparty Wrote: I feel...happy. Thank you for at least SOMETHING, catfish.What are you talking about? That "something" is the same thing you got here:
http://atheistforums.org/thread-20756-po...#pid504249
and here:
http://atheistforums.org/thread-20756-po...#pid504261
and here:
http://atheistforums.org/thread-20756-po...#pid504255
and they're all just more elaborate versions of here:
http://atheistforums.org/thread-20756-po...#pid504230
(September 12, 2013 at 9:06 pm)BadWriterSparty Wrote: I'm not certain if the Bible itself claims to be unerring as a whole, but I feel that you would agree with me that many Christians do make the claim that their Holy Book is unerring.Why do you need to know my views? Are you prejudiced against Christians like missluckie is?
(September 12, 2013 at 9:06 pm)BadWriterSparty Wrote: I have a hunch that they do this based on the idea that something inspired by a perfect being cannot be wrong. Where do you stand on this?Again with questions regarding my personal views, this time regarding people. What relevance do my views of what people believe about things written over 1900 years ago have to do with what is actually written there? I care not why you would commit a logical fallacy or factual error, I only care (and will point out) that your committed one.
(I have a hunch you believe that only because someone told you it. )
(September 12, 2013 at 9:06 pm)BadWriterSparty Wrote: (And we can let missluckie find some biblical evidence for the claim that it says it's unerring, but I doubt after all that's transpired in this thread that she'll want to address your concern.)
Oh, do you mean that it would be too embarassing for her? I can understand that sentiment. She created a thread dangerously close to a bannable offence. She strawmanned a Chritian's viewpoint and said that such viewpoint was akin to being mentally ill. Then she admitted to finding them justified in following a fucked-up viewpoint based on a book like she was espousing (but not justified in believing in God) which I think makes her just as "mentally ill" as those she wishes to ridicule. She strawmanned my position by accusing me of saying she was going to hell when she knew months ago that I don't believe in hell. She also strawmanned my positition by focusing on aeonian (incorrectly I might add). You did basically the same thing so I am quite surprised you still responded and admitted that you are uncertain concerning that which I challenged.
Since you're a good sport and your fluffy pillows, er... I mean iron knuckles tickled, I figure I'll give you something:
I'm a Christian and proud of it. I also believe in a God who exists beyond this universe.
(September 12, 2013 at 12:05 am)missluckie26 Wrote:catfish Wrote:Like I've said before, bare assertions abound 'round these here parts...
As do asswipes who aren't worth the breath. You are aware that just cuz you claim victory doesn't mean you won right? Yeah. If that's how you judge your success (by wasting peoples' time and effort then pissing them off to the point they won't reply to you), then whooo-boy I bet you're conceited as fuck. It's dishonest, really.
Shoo fly
Sigh... I can't claim victory unless you admit your error, otherwise it's just unfinished business until you make the same error and I ask for evidence again.
If you think verifying your claims is waste of time then I can understand how we came into this little "discussion" that has your panties in such a bunch. Do you form your own opinions or do you rent them from evilbible?
What's dishonest is making stuff up and claiming it's true.
