(February 25, 2014 at 11:59 pm)Ryantology (╯°◊°)╯︵ ══╬ Wrote:(February 25, 2014 at 1:17 pm)discipulus Wrote: I use the information and evidence at my disposal to make a determination on whether the WTC attack actually happened the same way I use the information and evidence at my disposal to make a determination on whether or not the events recorded in the gospels actually happened. In this way my methodology is consistent.
The application of your methodology is not consistent. You accept a lower standard of evidence for things which support your preconceived beliefs.
If that is how I came to the conclusion that the truth claims of Christianity were true, then your point might have validity.
Since that is not how I arrived at my conclusions, nor have I stated that was how I went about my investigative research, your argument is a strawman.